首页> 外文OA文献 >Procyclicality and the New Basel Accord – Banks’ Choice of Loan Rating System
【2h】

Procyclicality and the New Basel Accord – Banks’ Choice of Loan Rating System

机译:顺周期性与新巴塞尔协议–银行选择贷款评级系统

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision is proposing to introduce, in 2006, new risk-based requirements for internationally active (and other significant) banks. These will replace the relatively risk-invariant requirements in the current Accord. The new requirements for the largest bank will be based on bank ratings of the probability of default of the borrowers. There is evidence that the choice of loan ratings which are conditional on the point in the economic cycle could lead to sharp increases in capital requirements in recessions. This makes the question of which rating schemes banks will use very important. The paper uses a general equilibrium model of the financial system to explore whether banks would choose to use a countercyclical, procyclical or neutral rating scheme. The results indicate that banks would not choose a stable rating approach, which has important policy implications for the design of the Accord. It makes it important that banks are given incentives to adopt more stable rating schemes. This consideration has been reflected in the Committee's latest proposals, in October 2002.
机译:巴塞尔银行监管委员会提议在2006年为国际上活跃的(以及其他重要的)银行引入基于风险的新要求。这些将替代当前协议中相对风险不变的要求。最大银行的新要求将基于银行对借款人违约概率的评级。有证据表明,以经济周期为条件选择贷款评级可能会导致经济衰退期间资本需求急剧增加。这使得银行将使用哪种评级方案的问题变得非常重要。本文使用金融系统的一般均衡模型来探讨银行是否会选择使用反周期,顺周期或中性评级方案。结果表明,银行不会选择稳定的评级方法,这对协议的设计具有重要的政策意义。激励银行采用更稳定的评级方案非常重要。 2002年10月委员会的最新提案反映了这一考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号